« Typical Greenpeace glossing over the real issue | Main | Sweet victory »

Re: Earlier post on energy

See Iain Murray on the Corner.

If you're determined to both decarbonize and stop sending money to the Middle East then there is but one plausible answer and it isn't a flex fuel mandate (although allowing sugar ethanol imports could be a smal factor). It's improved hybrid/electric technology for automobiles combined with nuclear-generated electricity. The auto manfacturers are moving very quickly on their end, and it would not surprise me if all the storage problems were solved and long-range mostly electric vehicles were the norm by 2020. The technology isn't there yet, though, so mandates are useless. As for nuclear, there's a chance that lawmakers will see its value and override environmentalists like they're doing in Europe. The enviros will, however, put up one heck of a fight on that.

Read the whole thing.

I have his book, The Really Inconvenient Truths: Seven Environmental Catastrophes Liberals Don't Want You To Know About -- Because They Helped Cause Them, but haven't read it yet.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 27, 2008 9:54 PM.

This post is copyright © 2008 Nathan C. Brindle. All rights reserved.

The previous post in this blog was Typical Greenpeace glossing over the real issue.

The next post in this blog is Sweet victory.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35